Note to sign painters: Head for West Virginia . . .

19 Jul

Letter to the editor

San Antonio Express-News

P.O. Box 2171

San Antonio TX 78297

Your editorial in the Metro Section on Monday, July 19, 2010 entitled, Renaming dorm at UT proper, recounts the changing of Simkins Hall’s name to Creekside Hall, an action taken because of the scholarly research of Tom Russell, a former UT law professor and inquiries by the Austin American-Statesman. In what appears to be a rewrite of history, William Stewart Simkins is now considered a racist because of his association with the Ku Klux Klan, and therefore not worthy of having his name on a student residence named in his honor some 56 years ago, in spite of the fact that he was a longtime popular professor and considered a great legal scholar and teacher.

The article states that, Once that past was uncovered, it was clear Simkins’ name was inconsistent with the mission of a public university and an affront to UT Austin’s more than 2,000 African American students.

This letter is not meant to criticize UT for renaming the student hall. It is a matter of no consequence to me, nor should it be to anyone else, including your editorial writers and the 2,000 black students enrolled at UT. The student residence is UT’s property and subject to any name they prefer, for whatever reason. Nor will the renaming affect William Stewart Simkins—he’s been dead since 1929.

However—and this is a big however—it should affect the sovereign state of West Virginia. West Virginia is morally bound to follow in UT’s footsteps. They must follow UT’s lead and rename everything in West Virginia that carries the name of Robert C. Byrd, the late United States senator from West Virginia. The state should also rename everything that carries the name of Erma Byrd, placed there by the senator in honor of his long-time wife.

A member of the Democratic party, Byrd served as a West Virginia senator from 1959 to 2010, and was the longest-serving senator and the longest-serving member in the history of the United States Congress.

Why, you may ask, should the people of West Virginia rename all the places that sport the senator’s name? My answer is because it’s the right thing to do, the honorable thing to do. West Virginia should take the moral path and remove the name Robert C. Byrd from any and all public buildings and areas—parks, streets, highways, bridges, monuments and history books, and from all local, state and federal institutions and offices. While at it they should also remove and rename all the locations and institutions the senator named in honor of Erma Byrd, his late wife. Married for 69 years (1937—2006), one can reasonably assume that she was aware of his association with the Ku Klux Klan.

In 1944, Byrd wrote to segregationist Mississippi Senator Bilbo: I shall never fight in the armed forces with a Negro by my side … Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds. Click here to read the complete Wikipedia article.

Over the coming years, beginning with his first campaign, Senator Byrd did a complete about face—he renounced and denounced the Ku Klux Klan and embraced the black population of the United States, or at least the voting population of West Virginia, and was re-elected to his seat for the next fifty years.

Does that redeem him? Will his record in the U.S. Senate nullify the feelings he expressed in his 1944 letter to Theodore Bilbo, the segregationist Mississippi senator?

Perhaps—and perhaps not.

Listen to the You Tube video below, an interview with Tony Snow in 2007—the senator starts out fine, but manages to step on his pepperoni before the interview ends, so stay with it to the end to hear his apology for his comments. Did he really change his feelings? Remember that  this interview was conducted in 2007 following decades of professing far different feelings toward blacks—a slip of the tongue, perhaps?

In closing, allow me to repeat UT’s reasoning for renaming Simkins Hall:

Once that past was uncovered, it was clear Simkins’ name was inconsistent with the mission of a public university and an affront to UT Austin’s more than 2,000 African American students.

I submit to you that the same rationale should be applied by West Virginia residents regarding the plethora of places that are named in Byrd’s honor. Click here to read the 51 places that have been identified, plus nine named to honor his wife, a total of 60 and counting—the authors do not claim that the list is complete and are soliciting any that do not appear on the list.

The following editorial statement should appear in the Charleston Gazette and every other newspaper in West Virgina:

Once the past was uncovered, it is clear that Robert Byrd’s name and the name of his wife are inconsistent with the mission of the various edifices and other locations that bear their names, therefore they must be renamed—the present names are an affront to West Virginia’s population of some 52,000 African Americans.

An important footnote: West Virginia is home to some 52,000 African Americans—that’s 50,000 more than were supposedly affronted by William Stewart Simkins’ name on a residence hall at Austin’s University of Texas campus. I wonder if an effort has ever been mounted to rename even one of the 60 plus places in West Virginia that bear the Byrd name?

A final note: In the interests of full disclosure, I must admit that I did not submit this letter to the editor. Over the years I have accumulated numerous rejections from that worthy, some of which—but not all—may have included a thought, or thoughts, that could possibly be considered criticisms of the paper. I don’t handle rejections well so I decided to appeal to a wider audience—the highly erudite and always perceptive readers of my postings on Word As of this posting I have never been rejected—not once—by Word Press.

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it!


Posted by on July 19, 2010 in Uncategorized


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

6 responses to “Note to sign painters: Head for West Virginia . . .

  1. cindydyer

    July 19, 2010 at 8:03 pm

    Excellent points, all. I wish you WOULD get it published. It needs to see a wider audience than your WordPress viewers. You have framed the situation in a way that the UT folks just can’t argue with. Wanna run for office? 😉 Great analysis!

    • thekingoftexas

      July 20, 2010 at 7:37 am

      Hey, mija, you’re playing my tune—I’ll take EXCELLENT and GREAT and I agree, naturally, with everything you have said. I briefly considering taking out a contract to have the message sky-written over San Antonio, but with the freakish winds in this part of the country I probably wouldn’t get my money’s worth.

      As for my running for office, I’m probably carrying far too much baggage, but if I were to do so I would campaign with the same fervor that Alvin Greene displayed in his run for the Democratic senate primary in South Carolina—no money, no internet site, no office, no television commercials, no campaigning, no townhouse meetings, etc., and the Democrats of South Carolina gave him a resounding sixty percent of the vote—my kind of candidate!

  2. Larry Sones

    July 19, 2010 at 10:11 pm

    Reminds me of a bumper sticker one of my children told me about seeing recently. “Where are we going, and why am I in this handbasket?” America, once the breadbasket of the world, now the handbasket!

    • thekingoftexas

      July 20, 2010 at 7:24 am

      That’s a nice analogy, “breadbasket versus handbasket.” That bumper sticker undoubtedly refers to “going to hell in a handbasket.”

      From my early childhood days, ‘way back in the dim mists of the past century, that expression was attributed to the French revolution and the handbasket that caught the many heads that were separated from the bodies of enemies of the state, hence the term “going to—etc., etc.”

      Shades of Charles Dickens and “A Tale of Two Cities!”

      Thanks for the visit and for the comment.

  3. Kelley Saunders

    July 19, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Very well written. You make a great case for making those changes.

    • thekingoftexas

      July 20, 2010 at 7:12 am

      A great case? Just great? Okay, I’ll settle for great, especially considering its source (exclamation point). Of course, we both know that mine is “the voice of him that crieth in the wilderness.” Ain’t nobody listening ‘cept you, Cindy and your cousin Larry Sones—hey, that’s enough—I’ll keep shoveling on.

      I know you’re filled with curiosity concerning the expression “keep shoveling on.” It’s from “Duffy’s Tavern,” an old-time radio show from the nineteen-forties. A recurring character and hanger-on at the tavern was an undertaker named Digger O’dell, and each time he left the tavern he would say, “Well, I guess I’ll be shoveling on.”

      Thanks for staying up late and thanks for the comment.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: